Uganda orders schools funded by Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, to shut down
A legal tug-of-war between Ugandan authorities and a for-profit international chain of schools has led to the education provider being ordered to shut down in a matter of weeks, leaving the lives of thousands of pupils in limbo.
Uganda's High Court has described the Bridge International Academies (BIA)
-- which is funded by the likes of Microsoft's Bill Gates and
Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg -- as unsanitary and unqualified, and has
ordered it to close its doors in December because it ignored Uganda's
national standards and put the "life and safety" of its 12,000 young
students on the line.
The Director of Education Standards for the Ministry,
Huzaifa Mutazindwa, said that the nursery and primary schools were
not licensed, the teachers weren't qualified and that there was no
record of its curriculum being approved.
"The
Ministry does not know what is being taught in these schools which is a
point of concern to (the) government," Mutazindwa said.
The
low-cost education provider, which has 63 campuses across Uganda, is
allowed to remain open until December 8 to allow students to sit for
exams and finish third term. This was after BIA secured an interim court
order that restrained the government from closing its schools until its
main case for stay could be heard in court.
For
its part, BIA — which runs more than 400 nursery and primary schools
across Africa — has continuously denied the allegations that have been
made by the government.
"There's a
lot of miscommunication and a lot of very serious, unfounded
allegations. We would like to be given the opportunity to explain
ourselves ... The Ministry has been unwilling to give us an audience to
set the record straight," Uganda's BIA director, Andrew White, .
In a statement, BIA addressed eight allegations
that have been made about its operations. It said it teaches the
Ugandan curriculum, all schools have good sanitation facilities and that
the majority of their teachers are certified and registered. Those who
aren't certified and registered, it said, are attending in-service
training.
When
asked why the allegations were made if they weren't true, White said:
"We definitely feel like a lot of pressure has been applied to have a
particular view of Bridge that is a negative one."
He suggested that the opposition against BIA was because the campuses competed against local state-run and private schools.
"I
don't think the government is threatened by Bridge, but I think lobby
groups are trying to make the government and ministry feel like they
should be," White said.
A private institution 'profiting from the poor'
One educational advocacy group agrees with the Ugandan authorities' decision to close BIA.
President of the Global Campaign for Education (GCE), Camilla Croso, said that the quality of their schools is "totally inadequate and unacceptable."
"They
are profit making enormously," she said. "It's very indecent because
they are looking at poor people as a profitable market."
"It
really is incompatible to have human rights and profit making because
you are motivated and act in completely different ways."
Salima Namusobya, the Executive Director for the Initiative for Society and Economic Rights (ISER), also agreed with the closured that BIA's intentions were insincere.
"(BIA)
has come into the country and not discussed with the regulators and set
up a massive project," she said, adding that privatization of education
goes against human rights principles -- particularly if it targets the
poor.
"I think there's some level
of arrogance that comes with this and I really think they're for the
profit and not to assist the children."
'Standardized' and 'scripted' education
Critics allege that BIA's education methods are not transparent, and that their approach is standardized and scripted.
"You can't call it an education that Bridge is offering," Croso said.
"You
have technology -- like tablets -- often standing in place of teachers
and you have very scripted classes that tell the teachers exactly what
to do and when -- so you don't have any sort of autonomy and you can't
improvise."
She said teachers needed to understand the topics so they could panel it.
"Education has nothing to do with that (standardization) -- it's about debating, thinking and discussions."
Croso
said that instead, society should demand that governments "step into
their responsibility" to ensure it is putting resources into quality
education.
Namusobya from ISER said she believes BIA causes segregation between the poor and rich.
She said in government-run schools every child is treated equally, but BIA's model only targets the poor.
"(They are) only going to interact with themselves... When will they get to interact with other children?
"It's
like you're saying that these children, because they are poor, they
deserve to be in bad infrastructure, they deserve to sit in classes on
their own and maybe one day they'll catch up with the rich."
There's no 'adequate choice of education' in Uganda
In
response to the criticism it's received, BIA argues that it provides
alternative education for students who would other be forced to study in
state-run schools and notes that it only charges $6 a month.
"The
existence of Bridge is in response to hundreds of thousands of parents
who as of today don't have an adequate choice of education for their
children," White said.
"The reason Bridge exists is to try and help the government address this by providing innovative and cost effective solutions."
While $6 a month seems like a minute amount to some, NGOs have argued that it's a substantial amount to charge those in poverty.
But White said BIA provides an "effective and affordable service" that parents want for their children.
"The poor are individual actors who can make informed decisions on how to spend their hard earned money," he said.
"Parents
have seen in the short time that their children have been with Bridge
that they are incredibly engaged. Parents for the first time see their
kids wanting to go to school and they have children who are actively
doing their homework every day."
While BIA has not yet evaluated the performance of their children in Uganda, in Kenya BIA found that is students "outperform their peers in public schools in basic literacy and reading."
"We
have a track record for academic success ... The model is very similar
in Uganda and we expect in 2017 they will also excel." White said.
He said BIA uses technology to help its teachers provide a "holistic" education.
"Bridge
does not believe technology can replace a teacher ... We've spent
millions of dollars to ensure our teachers have the resources and skills
to make sure they can provide our pupils with the highest possible
education."
He
said if those lobbying against the organization "came and engaged" with
their teaching and learning they "would see that it is extremely
interactive" where teachers engaged with their pupils and worked equally
as hard on the strong and weak performers.
Co-Founder of BIA, Shannon May, also explained to how its school fees and donations were invested into the academies.
"All school fees are spent on operating and supporting the academies," she said.
"In
addition, Bridge has invested over $100m in education and technology
research and development, capital expenses for schools, and to cover
operating expenses that are greater than the fees we charge."
But
Croso from GCE said that regardless, for BIA and any other private
organization to benefit Ugandan education, they need to work within the
country's law.
"BIA stands out and this is an opportunity to learn from the mistakes," she said.
While
the debate continues in Uganda until the final hearing in December,
White from BIA said it was "affirming" to see how committed parents were
to BIA in the short time they had children in their classes.
"What
we're doing in Uganda is positive. We can see the impact it's having
and we want to continue to do whatever we can and whatever is in our
power to make sure that continues."
No comments
Post a Comment